Today emmie and I went probably the furthest into age play that we have so far allowed ourselves. She coloured in a colouring book while wearing a cute little girl dress, then pleasured her daddy in multiple ways. It's a fantasy I've never really gone to before – having a personal history there it was something very odd to think of doing at first. But it is working out rather well with emmie being my little girl and she seems to really enjoy having a daddy. E and mitda have been very encouraging as well as far as this aspect of our relationship goes, even as far as to prod us to actively go further in exploring it. I adore emmie and want to do everything I can to ensure it's safe for her to explore this fantasy, and I adore all of my family for being open to what can seem like a very strange kink at first to non-initiates.
Saturday, December 22, 2007
Thursday, August 02, 2007
What a strange world of work
I am working a contract right now with a large, rather well known computer hardware OEM and services company, in their services division. They do, unlike many of my former clients, write software on an ongoing basis, but they hired me contract to write a market trial, which is close to starting.
Now emmie and mitda are not the most subtle slaves in the bdsm world, they both wear collars in virtually all situations, mitda wears cuffs most of the time, and they make no bones about the fact that they are my wife and girlfriend, which is noticeable even to those who don't know what collars and cuffs indicate. They have been around my work enough times that the people on my project, other than the ones who are absolutely clueless, know what the situation is at my household.
Well, surprise, noone seems to take much offense. In fact one of the members of my very small team turned out to be a TPE/IE Master with a live in slave. We went together to the recent GWNN conference (group with no name - a local bdsm group).
And this is what this meandering post is finally getting to. My colleague is very much a dom. He is ex military, very much into controlling himself and his surroundings, and confident in his ability to do so. He and I get along extremely well. However there is another member of the team who doesn't share that attribute of easy going self confidence. He tends to be at turns blustery or sulky, or tries to be easygoing with a rather undeveloped sense of humour that can be either quaint or irritating, depending upon one's mood. Because this fellow, although also a contractor, has been with the client for a good long period of time, while my other colleague and I joined for this project only, he is generally the lead on one of the main aspects of the product development.
Suffice it to say I openly have issues with him. And vice versa. But that isn't the story here either. He, let's refer to him as "J", has major issues with my other colleague "B". And vice versa there too. So here we go to a little vignette.
The project has been an extremely rushed affair. This is not that unusual in software development, and is part of the reason we were hired. There simply wasn't the turnaround time to reallocate permanent employees to the project, so contractors were brought in. However as a result normal process methods have been somewhat lax as we rushed past checkpoints and approval items to simply get something done and working. Now B is the requirements engineer for the project, and as we move precariously closer to QA he has become more and more aware that there are major differences between the product we have in hand and any requirements documentation that may have existed for the project. As a result, and mainly with other business-side members in view, he sent out an email, strongly worded as is his style, asking that from this point on any changes be vetted through him. After all this is his job. And he wants to get these changes, however minor, documented so that QA can perform their jobs. If they don't know what the current program is meant to do, it becomes a worthless task to test it. But the wording of the email put our friend J's back out of joint. And in response he went into bluster mode, came over to where B and I sit, and began yelling. It's not a big office and almost right away the entire project team was at B's desk getting involved in the "discussion".
B responded pretty calmly, repeated a couple of times "J., you need to calm down". Eventually this advice did reasonably sink in and the crowd dispersed. However B. wasn't happy with the situation. Once most people had disappeared for the day he took J. aside and to a meeting room. And proceeded to "rip him a new one" as it were for his unprofessionalism and poor behaviour. J. became extremely upset, to the point of tears, and told B. that he had an anger management problem. B. was nonplussed, telling J. that if he couldn't control his a. m. problem at work, he simply shouldn't be working.
Why have I wasted your time with this rather long vignette as part of an even longer post? Because it illustrates well, along with another comment J. had made as one of his rather quaint jokes, shortly after I had met him, something I started to talk about in a post earlier on this blog regarding bdsm and abuse. J. had said to me and others in the group when asked about his weekend "after you marry, one night when you're fast asleep, your wife rips your spine out and you don't make a decision after that".
I'm not implying J. is into spousal abuse. I wouldn't know and wouldn't want to know. But with an anger management problem such as he has it wouldn't be unthinkable. At least many actual wife abusers have anger management problems, that much would be accepted, I think, by most authorities on the subject. Yet it is B., who doesn't comprehend or accept lack of self control even when caused by such a problem, that is into bdsm Mastery, and keeps a live in slave to that end. I have no doubt either that B. can be quite sadistic with his consensual partner. But he is not an anger management class candidate nor is he a danger to his partner, while J., whose comment on his wife spoke (non-bdsm style) submission, that is a real danger when it comes to spousal abuse.
Does this mean that Dominants are never spouse abusers and submissives are? No. Does it mean that most spousal abusers are not vanilla? No. But it does show the difference I had been trying to express between a Dominant and an abuser. Abuse comes from lack of control, over the self, over others. And this lack is what makes abusers pick helpless targets. A Dominant first chooses someone who wants to be dominated, and someone who is worth dominating. If for any reason you find out that your next door neighbour whose kids are on your kids' basketball team and whose wife runs the PTA is secretly into bondage and discipline, domination and submission, and sado-masochism, remember that it doesn't mean anyone there is in danger, physically or psychologically. It may be the nervous churchgoer across the street that is hurting his wife and marring his kids, in a way that is permanent and difficult to reverse.
Wednesday, July 04, 2007
When the Dom doesn't want to dom.
This is a difficult thing for some slaves, not for others. emelina doesn't seem to particularly mind, while mitda is rather upset by the whole thing. In any event there's not a lot I can do about it at the moment. We will see how I feel tomorrow morning.
It is the 4th of July. Perhaps everyone needs a holiday.
Mitdasein
Tuesday, July 03, 2007
Dominance and Abuse
Dominants get a lot of flack. We're accused of being "spousal abusers with an excuse", or "sadists with a philosophy". The thing is, anger is a huge part of abuse, and lack of control the other major factor. Sadists get off on pain, domination is a tool. Dominants get off on control and domination, bondage, discipline and sado-masochism are tools of that control. Submissives or slaves want, crave, need that control, discipline and domination from their Masters.
Not that this post will convince anyone who doesn't know and understand someone involved in internal enslavement or total domination.
When it doesn't go right ...
Even in the best BDSM relationships, dominants with the best slaves, submissives happy and adoring of their masters, sometimes things don't go right ...
Today we played and it didn't go right. Maybe mitda wasn't in the right frame of mind, after all she had her day put out of rhythm by emmie and I being home. She'll get used to emmie being home but the Master being home on a work day always upsets things. Anyway we played and neither of us could get properly prepped or into it. And it didn't work. She got nowhere near subspace and I got nowhere near domspace. Yes there is such a thing.
I'm still learning, and so are mitda and emmie. Perhaps I should have used my hands instead of toys, to gauge her response. But shoulds aren't the answer. We all have to continue to learn our places and each other.
A Blah Tuesday
Last week, after many years of avoiding psychiatry, emelina was diagnosed with a number of complaints (no, sexual deviancy wasn't among them). Aside from the shock of actually dealing with a diagnosis, she has been dealing with the side effects of the medication she was put on and hasn't managed a day of work since, although she has tried going into work twice now.
Family income isn't really a big issue at the moment. We can survive off my income and E's income quite nicely. It would be great if emelina can get disability but nobody's really getting their hopes up on that, we know too much about the SSA and their methods of avoiding awarding disability, especially to psych. patients.
So not the fun type of day we had on Sunday, although we started off the morning with some good group morning sex. I decided to work from home after realizing I needed to learn some things about my current project code base and didn't want to do that learning in front of my colleagues.
mitda and emelina should be back shortly from the misadventure at work. I suppose we'll discuss what can be done to either help her get back to functioning or deal with her being at home with mitda.
Sunday, July 01, 2007
Motorcycle and then some
Today I took emelina and mitda for a short run on the motorcycle. This after showing E how to basically ride. Of course he picked it up right away. emelina and mitda have taste in other doms. Afterwards we ate dinner, and then came the most intense non-disciplinary thrashing session with mitda in a long time. emelina was watching, and then E came in and joined the audience. mitda was in subspace heaven. i played with her sphincter with a toy while whipping her, then had her go down as the whipping continued. To cap it off we had anal with her legs in the air while E took emelina from behind. Very hot all round. Now E and emelina are online with their laptops and relaxing while mitda finishes the dishes. I love my poly M/s family.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
Finally!
After a few years and some objections from my primary my poly family agreed to my desire for another motorcycle. Yes, I could have simply bought one, but sometimes consensus is preferable to domination, even for a dominant.
The bike is a simple one, a good learner bike, and so it will be good for the other male member of the household, who would like to learn but has never ridden one before. And it was cheap and will keep me happy for the year and a half or so I need to be able to afford the bike I really want. Hell, anything is fun to ride and as long as it can do the speed limit on any highway I don't actually *need* more.
Emelina is looking forward to going for rides with me. Mitda is more circumspect but she seems to have given in to the fact that she *is* going to get on the back of a motorcycle.
- Mitdasein
Tuesday, June 26, 2007
"Getting Away with It"
From a vanilla person's standpoint showing mercy in the event of a punishable offence is laudable, "nice", etc. To a dominant it feels irresponsible, and to a slave it feels uncaring and neglectful. Because I'm not in a dominant mindset 24/7 (just the reality of any 24/7 relationship - you're not always in the mode) I made the crucial mistake of being merciful on a number of occasions, and wound up with two very upset, unsatisfied slaves feeling completely neglected and uncared for.
Punishment for punishable offences has to be dealt out fairly, coldly (never in anger), and consistently. It is, really, the only way for the slave to feel that their owner cares and would do anything for them. "Abuse" in a D/s relationship means neglect. Trying to get this across in the vanilla world would likely end me up in jail. But it's the reality of my life path. "Getting away with it" simply cannot be allowed, because all it means to the slave is neglect..
Sunday, June 24, 2007
Domestic Discipline
Atlhough mentioned in the description of the blog, I haven't really talked at all about DD in the blog itself. This week I came up with a list of household tasks (stolen from a Microsoft Excel template - thank you MS, lol) for the two slaves. It wound up being fairly easy, my just being able to assign basically what each already does, but formalizing it seems to have made the whole quad happier about the needs around the house.
Not that this comes close to the reality of what domestic discipline should mean. For my new slave it is an impossible ideal while she works full time. It is a closer reality for mitda, who has not worked outside the home for some time. The plan is for emelina to enter retirement from outside work later this year and be a full time service girl for me and the other male household member
Saturday, June 23, 2007
A Little Time Alone
Tonight we
are going to do the club scene again. Last weekend was a qualified
success, with emelina and I going to one type of club and mitda and e
going to another to suit different tastes. Tonight we attempt again to
find one that we all like. emelina and mitda are currently out
shopping for last minute necessities for the outing. e and his
youngest kidlet are at Six Flags hopefully getting rather wet and
having a good time.
Living in a poly household, I don't really spend much time alone. Oh,
I might be in the office while others are in the bedroom or the garage,
but not actually alone in the house. It's both a relief and a
frustration.
Vanilla after kink?
Mitdasein
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Looking at others' experiences
"The problem that I have been having is that a lot of websites dealing with this are mostly dealing with the feelings of the psychology from a submissive point of view. Why is it, that these feelings can easily be classified for submissives, yet there is no website out there that deals with the Dominant side of things. No set of `tools` that would help a Dominant understand these issues and help them to enhance the relationship. It's almost like Doms are to know-it-all. Aren't we humans after all? Do we not have our own issues and emotional bagage to deal with?
I guess that is one of the major parts I am struggling with, at the moment. Do I want more control .. yes but how do I go about implementing this. A good example is `reactance`. It's a description of how a submissive will fight certain aspects of the control. But it is not said how a Dom deals with the fact that if the submissive tells him where to stick it. A Dom might be able to tell that the sub is reacting against his orders, but what tools does he have at his disposal?
Does he punish her? This could be one way, but would punishment really deal with the underlying issue? I tend to believe this is certainly not the case. One way would be talking, but what if both parties have talked and debated the issue, and no agreement can be reached? Do you just waltz over the issue and pretend to ignore the muttering and the fingered salute that is given behind your back?
I guess my problem is, that I have trouble at the moment to grasp where to go from here. How to implement structures that increase the submissiveness, without it becoming a forced affair. How to keep the relationship alive and blossoming without grinding it slowly to a halt in stricter and stricter rules.
I was just thinking of a quote I have: From the point of view of a typical dominant, most are also primarily looking for a relationship and many are themselves exploring their dominance as they go, unsure of exactly what they want, or how to teach or even ask it of a submissive, to say nothing of how lost they are when the submissive says no. Their focus is more on finding someone who matches and compliments themselves and then exploring with the submissive only what interests them. I am not sure where this comes from or who the orginal source is, but it is true in a way."
I'm not going to bother with the link as the blog owner has specifically said he is no longer interested in discussing his D/s relationship, he is just living it. Another blog that is being kept up has had a couple of good posts but I'm reserving judgment until I read a few more, if I still like it I'll add it to my blogroll.
Mitdasein
Sunday, June 10, 2007
M. is back
Of course I can't complain, since with emelina I now have two permanent live in subs. Emelena is also taking the lead of the 3 of us in really investigating the bdsm lifestyle, something mitda and I have steered around to this point. You can see some results of this on the web page with the bdsm flag now proudly flown and our association to Austin GWNN (group with no name) noted on the sidebar.
One thing with researching bdsm online is the number of people whose posts lead one to believe that either they a) live in a Gorean fantasy world or b) are full of crap about their real life D/s experiences, especially in a permanent live-in situation.
I've read things on reactance where the writer (a slave) says her reactance "increases" when an important freedom is withheld or completely taken away, such as being locked in the cell on days where she is supposed to go to work (!). Either they are in no need of her income and her dom is trying to get her fired, or he is an idiot. And if he doesn't want her to work, then why not simply order her, as her master, to leave her job?
more later
Das
Friday, May 25, 2007
End of the M. ?
This created an interesting situation, to be sure, but since the mastress lived over a thousand miles away their relationship was confined to online time and phone conversations, much as ours had been until mitda packed up from L.A. and moved to Toronto to live with me.
Even online relationships suffer from the impingements of reality such as lack of time to spend together, and not feeling at least "as" preferred by one's partner relative to their other committments. And this seems in fact to have happened to my wife and her mastress. Since it is easier to avoid someone online than someone one happens to live with, my wife, after writing a damning email, simply stopped being available by IM or phone to her mastress.
This has put me in a bit of a quandary. In general masters/doms support one another, and a sub, even if no longer collared, just walking away is an odd position for a master to be put in. But I empathize with my wife's reasons as well.
m. mitdasein
`
Saturday, November 04, 2006
Taken some time off ...
Sunday, September 03, 2006
Playing or scolding?
- mitdasein
powered by performancing firefox
powered by performancing firefox
Saturday, September 02, 2006
Beginning Discipline
The last year has been a back and forth struggle with this, under less than ideal conditions, trying to live out a dream master / slave lifestyle.
So to begin this blog, a quote, "The teacher is like the student except in this point only, that he has so much more to learn".
- m. mitdasein
powered by performancing firefox